Linguistic Anthropology

The study of language has been part of anthropology since the discipline started in the 1ate 1870s. This site is a place for linguistic anthropologists to post their work and discuss important events and trends in the field.

Friday, August 14, 2009

Another political non-lie

I've been hearing an awful lot about health care reform in the US this summer - even from British outlets. It's all a bit disconcerting, especially the riotous town hall meetings and the arguments that seem unmoored from the facts.

FactCheck.org has a nice piece debunking seven falsehoods related to this debate, two from proponents of reform and five from opponents.

I'm interested, though, in a claim that is linguistically interesting because it is not actually a falsehood, though it is not unambiguously true, either. That is, the claim that the United States has the best health care system in the world. I've heard this claim made several times in the past few weeks; I've also heard it decried as a lie. But the claim is not really a lie in the sense of a deliberate recitation of an untruth with the intent to deceive. I think that most people who repeat the claim sincerely believe it, and most who call it a lie sincerely believe that it is untrue. The problem may be that there is no shared definition of either best or health care system.

On one hand, some of the most cutting edge medical care has been developed at US hospitals. The first successful heart-lung transplant was performed at Stanford University Medical Center; the first mechanical heart implantation was carried out at Texas Heart Institute. In terms of individual medical treatments, the United States has been on the cutting edge. In 1979 Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran, famously insisted that his gallbladder disease be treated in the United States. While that may be old news, the elite still seem to come to the US for treatment: according to Marketplace radio, wealthy foreign patients spend billions of dollars at US hospitals each year.

On the other hand, 28,000 infants die in the United States each year; that's a higher infant mortality rate than Hong Kong, New Zealand, Cuba, or most of Europe. According to the 2008 CIA Fact Book, overall life expectancy in the US is about 78.1 years. That's higher than in many poorer countries in Latin America or Africa, but lower than the EU, Japan, Korea, Canada, or Israel. The US ranks about 30th in overall life expectancy among United Nations member states.

So, if best health care system means "most cutting-edge in terms of treatments available," then the US may be near the top. If it means "best society-wide outcomes," however, the US is not at the top and may actually be below average.

[UPDATE: Writing in the Washington Post on August 23, T.R. Reid calls the claim that "America has 'the finest health care' in the world" a myth, and states flatly, "We don't." He goes on to point out that society-wide outcomes are better in most "advanced" countries.

In the next paragraph, though, he suggests that the US has "the best-educated doctors and nurses, the most advanced hospitals, [and] world-class research".

You would think that I should have something clever to say about that. Hm.]

Labels: , , ,

6 Comments:

Blogger GAC said...

Interesting take on it. Semantic difficulties aside, I take it as a kind of half-truth. The deception, sometimes deliberate, sometimes not, lies in not defining what is meant, and therefore misleading people who impose their own definitions on the terms, which in many cases will make the statement false.

I think that probably qualifies the statement as simple bullshit.

11:50 PM  
Blogger Chad Nilep said...

Yes, as is too often the case in argumentation, I think many occurrences of this line qualify as bullshit in the technical sense. That is, not a lie, but not strictly intended as true.

11:49 AM  
Blogger rahul said...

A very interesting post thanks for sharing.

sejour linguistique australie

1:17 PM  
Blogger Angela said...

Only about 2 months later, but....the infant death statistics are skewed too. There's no standard for reporting them, so in many countries (both third world and those with socialized medicine) babies who are born seriously prematurely are not even treated as patients, and are counted as miscarriages. Here we currently spare no expense to save babies that would simply be left to die in other countries, and when they simply aren't able to survive, they're counted as infant deaths.

Here's a link to hopefully prove that "I am not making this up."

http://www.overpopulation.com/articles/2002/cuba-vs-the-united-states-on-infant-mortality/

10:23 AM  
Blogger season said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

8:29 AM  
Blogger Term Papers said...

Good Information About "Another political non-lie"

Post by:
Term Papers

3:50 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home